This study is the first comprehensive treatment of the provincial allocations system in the late Roman Republic, between the provincial law carried by Gaius Gracchus in 123 BCE and that carried by Pompeius Magnus in 52 BCE. It considers the actual process of allocations, from the Senate's decree of consular and praetorian provinces through to the transfer of command on the ground. Different chapters address the system of allotment (sortitio), the authorisation of troops and funds (ornatio), and the ritual prerequisites for departure, all based solidly on the surviving evidence. An appendix recording the Senate's year-by-year decisions supports this and allows us to see trends in the data.
Since provincial questions were of central importance to the senatorial class, they were the source of many of the political contests which dominate our source record. And at every stage, the institutions shaped the politics. A new picture emerges, of structural conflicts revolving around the relationship between consuls and tribunes. As Rafferty argues, this made the provincial allocations system one of the central causes of Rome's growing political dysfunction in the late Republic.
"the book is a well-documented work of great value and usefulness, and it is destined to become an essential reference for subsequent studies on Republican provincial administration."
Alejandro Díaz Fernández, Klio, 16.11.2021
"… [eine] Pflichtlektüre für alle, die sich für Routineaspekte der römischen Provonzialverwaltung interessieren."
Konrad Stauner, Bonner Jahrbücher Band 219, 2019
"Provincial Allocations in Rome is a well-researched and structured book [...] and makes a compelling overall argument."
Brahm Kleinmann, Bryn Mawr Classical Review
Series | Historia – Einzelschriften |
---|---|
Volume | 254 |
ISBN | 978-3-515-12119-4 |
Media type | Book - Hardcover |
Edition number | 1. |
Copyright year | 2019 |
Publisher | Franz Steiner Verlag |
Length | 243 pages |
Illustrations | 2 b/w tables, 2 b/w diag. |
Size | 17.0 x 24.0 cm |
Language | English |